Do you think that infidelity should be punished legally in some way - be it a fine, imprisonment or something else. Or should everything be as it is - without consequences and everyone should pursue their happiness despite the emotional trauma for the victim? I'm talking about marriage and serious relationships.
Answers 21
Yes, it would definitely be very nice to have prisons for adultery or at least some serious penalties / fines. Safe from whores of both sexes. W / hetero
During the Middle Ages, this was punished, today it is punished in some Islamic countries. But it is also the responsibility of the one who allowed himself to marry and have children from such a person. No one is to blame for someone not being able to judge and understand what they are using it for.
In my opinion, the problem is not in the infidelities themselves, because they are only a consequence, not the real problem. The real problem is the value system, the mentality. No prison will fix your value system. What's the use of not cheating just to not go to jail after your mind is polluted and you think about it forever and it tempts you? Values need to be worked on, and they start with childhood, the media and upbringing. Notice what is advertised as cool - sex, orgies, drugs, tattoos, money at any cost. Ever since you were a child, you have been thinking about how to be free, to be rich, how family is old-fashioned and committed, etc. etc. You form yourself as a person with similar values, then wait for the pandiza to fix you. Rather, it will evoke a sense of being unjustly accused and not understanding why you are being punished,
Up to 2 Well, it would be extremely difficult for anyone to guess when they are lying and using it, especially if they are in love. The lover becomes blind, deaf, stupid, etc., and the fraudsters are waiting for just that. Alas, it is not written on their foreheads that they are like that and many people suffer because of them. So opinions like "what are you roaring about, you chose it" or "what are you roaring about, you chose it" are, to put it mildly, ridiculous and inappropriate.
I don't think it's very difficult to think of any adequate punishment for infidelity. I don't believe it will happen, and it's too cruel what we see there in the Islamic world - women killed with stones and so on. But I've always wondered: why, when you kill a physical person there is a vessel, a prison, a blood feud, and when you kill a person's soul - which always happens in infidelity - nothing follows. A very complex question that I think will not be answered soon.
Were you normal When they cheated on you and found the state hahaha, it's a pitiful job. Judge me man, there are civil claims, to become a razor.
Oh, he made me laugh a lot. As a lawyer, I can tell you that it does not seem logical to me to have a penalty for infidelity. There has never been such a thing in our legislation. However, there was a provision that when two people were engaged and one was dismissed from the marriage before it took place, he owed monetary compensation in equity to the other person. This was a provision from the time of the previous system, when family values had higher values and it was really a very shameful experience for the abandoned. Society despised him, as if he had something. Otherwise, in the Roman Empire, things were discussed in infidelity. The rule was that if a man caught his wife in love with her lover, he had the right to kill him. But only if he catches him at the scene of the act or while pursuing him. She can't meet him downtown in 2-3 days and kill him. One kind - something like the physiological affect in modern law has been recreated. However, I do not think that in the 21st century there may be fines for infidelity in the legislation.
But of course, why not !!! Even before someone commits to another, a contract must be signed for eternal unreserved fidelity, for an absolute ban on inflicting emotional trauma on you, something like buying a property ... a notary deed. You are buying a person who will be yours forever. You can even add clauses, the person in question is always obliged to make you happy at all costs. Dear author, how easy it was. You are born and live peacefully and happily and no one, for nothing in the world, has the right to cause you emotional trauma, having the imprudence to cheat on you. Something like living in a protective field surrounded by pink unicorns.
That's enough, people, tighten up, we have evolved and outgrown this phenomenon. This extramarital activity is on an emotional and psychological basis - it can possibly be treated, but not punished. There are no more logs and gallows, hoarding and burning. I'm sorry, it makes me laugh, remembering that for some infidelity is like a shared journey, they drive it "across" to such an extent that even the word infidelity is powerless and worthless. On this occasion, where were the halves of the infidels at the moment, so that this fly could enter their heads. Have you done everything necessary to stimulate the attention of the infidels and keep only on you? That is why in that world overseas psychologists are "in vogue", we can not understand everything, and it is very difficult to be "in the head" of your partner. Another serious problem is our vision, swollen bodies, new hair on the organs with which we hear or feel aromas, headaches healed suddenly in the marriage bed and so 20 days a month. Is the way out clear, and you punished, imprisonment- why !? Learn that you are not the owner of your partners and everyone decides how to break their head. For the record - I am against infidelity, I make incredible efforts and deprivations - I do it because I am convinced that it is worth it. I'm kidding - I sounded like a martyr, but it's a fact that I've been trying for over 20 years. Good luck and forgive the mistakes of unreasonable people! :) that you are not the owners of your partners and everyone decides how to break their head. For the record - I am against infidelity, I make incredible efforts and deprivations - I do it because I am convinced that it is worth it. I'm kidding - I sounded like a martyr, but it's a fact that I've been trying for over 20 years. Good luck and forgive the mistakes of unreasonable people! :) that you are not the owners of your partners and everyone decides how to break their head. For the record - I am against infidelity, I make incredible efforts and deprivations - I do it because I am convinced that it is worth it. I'm kidding - I sounded like a martyr, but it's a fact that I've been trying for over 20 years. Good luck and forgive the mistakes of unreasonable people! :)
Out of curiosity - what exactly does the injured party gain in this case? Your husband is cheating on you, his state fines him, and what? Will this make him love you suddenly? Will it reduce "emotional trauma"? The dude will pay the fine up to that point. Not to mention that "serious relationship" is a very expansive concept, for some a serious relationship is considered after a couple has lived together for several years, for others - meetings in cafes in the last 3 months. In fact, infidelity has been a rather expansive concept lately. Your wife looks at a man on the street - wow, she must want to sleep with him, she's cheating on her thoughts! Do we have to create a "thought police" now? Well, at least George Orwell would be interested.
You serious? People practice swing and threesomes and say that it strengthens the marriage and ignites the faded passion for the partner. The puppet loved his wife to the point that he led her to stomp and enjoyed orgasms with them. Half and more children belong to parents who are not officially married. What fines, what prisons? Wake up! They give a suspended sentence for a murdered person on the road! Cases have been pending for years! There are now cases of infidelity to start! And what will be this coexistence that exists under fear of imprisonment and a fine? It seems dumb and pathetic to me. Once upon a time, in the early socialist era, there were "comradely courts" in which a failed spouse was faced with answering to his colleagues that he had violated morals and promising not to do so. Guess if that stopped the infidelity !?
God, are you serious? If you want to be respected, respect yourself! What will be left of human freedom? If you think so, if you think that your partner is your property and that he owes you something, you are very deluded. Then do not be surprised if you are unhappy and only failures in life. A relationship should not be a prison for a person. He who is not able to take risks, to do his best knowing that one day they may cheat on him, does not know love and is not ready for a relationship. If so, buy a mannequin. He will be loyal to you, will comply with all your whims and will not protest. What if there is emotional trauma? You will experience it. Everyone has had some emotional trauma, it is not a pain to die, it hurts but it is overcome.
I think you should. However, marriage is a contract. Introduce the necessary clauses and, if this contract is violated, give them consequences! If they want, to sleep with others, to divorce and that's it!
"Judge my man, there are civil claims, to become a blade." For a blade is the man who violated the given OATH! But you don't understand it nowadays. Normal - you are all users and hypocrites.
Up to 7 You are a lawyer. We can't have faith in people like you, especially those who laugh, we normal people!
Do you think that a fine or punishment will stop an unbeliever from cheating? Because I think this is nonsense. It is clear to me in broad daylight that it is extremely nasty to be cheated on, but even to go to court, to impose fines, to ask for imprisonment ... If a law is imposed that everyone must be faithful to their partner, they should there is a punishment for those who are not. There is no such law. You have taken a marriage oath, your ring has a spiritual and moral value. Violation of the marriage vow is not a violation of state law, but simply a sign of mental decline. That you may not cheat on her, but still break your marriage vow. You humiliate a woman / man in front of friends - a fine. You cheat-fine. Do not help the household - fine. You stop loving and honoring as it was in the beginning - a fine. How many of you can put your hand on your heart and say that they have never broken their marriage vows even a little? If everyone dissatisfied with something starts jumping with demands for fines and imprisonment of their partner, it will not remain people on the streets. Let's make every moral value a law. Why not fine our bad friends too? Ha, even strangers who look at us with malice for no reason. Let's also make the envy of relatives punishable.
There are societies in which infidelity is punished, but in these same societies it is regulated how a man beats a woman. Whoever likes the idea can come and live there.
A woman does not cheat just like that - in most cases there are serious reasons for this - rude treatment of the husband or disinterest in the wife and family, alcohol and companies, putting friends and relatives in front of the wife and family, inability or unwillingness to help with upbringing and education of children, as well as in family support and many others like it.
Yes, infidelity, and especially marriage, is an evil that must not be tolerated. There must be punishments. The fact that so many people speak out in favor of the freedom to cheat speaks only of the decline we have reached as a society. It is no coincidence that infidelity is condemned by all literate religions and moral values. Because: 1) the emotional trauma 2) you violate the oath you gave before God and people, the so-called to be with man in good and evil 3) you break a contract 4) you inflict mental trauma on children if they are used to a normal family
One should not wonder why they threw so much energy to look for the one from Kostenets. As she cheated on him, and the state did not deal with such things, now she is chasing him ...
"19. A woman does not cheat just like that - in most cases there are serious reasons for this - rude treatment of the husband or disinterest in the wife and family, alcohol and companies, putting friends and relatives in front of the wife and family, inability or unwillingness to help the upbringing and education of children, as well as in the maintenance of the family and many others like that. " Of course, women are not to blame, they are always forced! At least the men say: I fainted, and so on. But women always have a reason. Which shows who the hypocritical sex is! As for maintenance - you don't seem to differentiate between a weaver and you pay. From this we can conclude which is the more naive sex. Aaa? You mean, like, saltines and their ilk, eh?