Glasses

   As someone who actually wears prescription glasses, although not tall, this whole thing with prescription glasses, to me, is such nonsense that it's just out of the question. I can't understand this thing. And worst of all, it's been going on for several years now, it seems. I don't know who came up with this idea, but it's super dumb. And as far as I know, you can definitely get eye problems, no matter that the glasses do not have a diopter. Your eyes don't need anything like that. It is clear to me that you just want to be "cool" and part of the crowd with these "glasses". In your place, I would not give my money for such a thing, even more than optics, where it will cost a lot of money. Who needs this thing? !!

   It's stupid. It's like using crutches without having leg problems.

   Honey, I'm with 4 diopters and I kill a person just to be able to go out once without glasses or lenses! You write that your sister has a diopter, but ask her how much fun it is not to see a few meters in front of you and what care you have. So honestly I do not understand what it is like to wear glasses and lenses without needing . Not to mention that if the glasses are not good you can damage your eyes and then it will suck. That's why you better not experiment.

   I read somewhere that with glasses the cornea receives less oxygen. I think it's stupid. I have a diopter, but sometimes when I'm on a walk I remove them. I soon changed them and stopped looking for frames that are less visible, you want the exact opposite. Well, it's full of frames that cover half the face, so whatever you decide, but for me it's another nonsense.

   Now, if you take some attractive frames, the glasses can be used as an accessory - for example, something pink, yellow or blue with glasses with a slight tingle or also colored. However, never take rimless glasses with the handles driven directly into the lenses (like Sergei Lavrov's). They are carcinogenic. I've been wearing glasses since I was little. They complicate me because they look dioptric and make me look like a bison and a jerk, but they also saved my eyes. Once from splashes of gasoline in the face, the second time a collision with insects. Also against reinforced snowflakes. One never knows where anything might come from. Separately protect the area around the eyes from darkening by the sun. If you do not like your nose or eyebrows also cover this area. The only important thing is not to look like a bison if you want to enjoy wearing this accessory and not activating its second function in you. As you can see, Spider-Man puts Peter Parker's glasses on and they take him for an appetizer everywhere. But as an accessory they have a second function. Just as the lid of the pot keeps pressure under it, so the glasses retain some complexes and a mania for expression to show that it is not something below the others. And this is quite a destructive force. The result is often like Christine's tea, or Gepi's brick. But you don't have diopters, so you probably won't activate that feature as an accessory. Unless you're a masochist. You would prefer to remove them instead of accumulating and accumulating more and more pressure which eventually turns into a powerful bomb due to the dioptric compulsion to stand on your face. Right? As you can see, Spider-Man puts Peter Parker's glasses on and they take him for an appetizer everywhere. But as an accessory they have a second function. Just as the lid of the pot maintains pressure under it, so the glasses retain some complexes and a mania for expression to show that it is not something below the others. And this is quite a destructive force. The result is often like Christine's tea, or Gepi's brick. But you don't have diopters, so you probably won't activate that feature as an accessory. Unless you're a masochist. You would prefer to remove them instead of accumulating and accumulating more and more pressure which eventually turns into a powerful bomb due to the dioptric compulsion to stand on your face. Right? As you can see, Spider-Man puts Peter Parker's glasses on and they take him for an appetizer everywhere. But as an accessory they have a second function. Just as the lid of the pot keeps pressure under it, so the glasses retain some complexes and a mania for expression to show that it is not something below the others. And this is quite a destructive force. The result is often like Christine's tea, or Gepi's brick. But you don't have diopters, so you probably won't activate that feature as an accessory. Unless you're a masochist. You would prefer to remove them instead of accumulating and accumulating more and more pressure which eventually turns into a powerful bomb due to the dioptric compulsion to stand on your face. Right? Just as the lid of the pot keeps pressure under it, so the glasses retain some complexes and a mania for expression to show that it is not something below the others. And this is quite a destructive force. The result is often like Christine's tea, or Gepi's brick. But you don't have diopters, so you probably won't activate that feature as an accessory. Unless you're a masochist. You would prefer to remove them instead of accumulating and accumulating more and more pressure which eventually turns into a powerful bomb due to the dioptric compulsion to stand on your face. Right? Just as the lid of the pot maintains pressure under it, so the glasses retain some complexes and a mania for expression to show that it is not something below the others. And this is quite a destructive force. The result is often like Christine's tea, or Gepi's brick. But you don't have diopters, so you probably won't activate that feature as an accessory. Unless you're a masochist. You would prefer to remove them instead of accumulating and accumulating more and more pressure which eventually turns into a powerful bomb due to the dioptric compulsion to stand on your face. Right? that you probably won't activate their function as an accessory. Unless you're a masochist. You would prefer to remove them instead of accumulating and accumulating more and more pressure which eventually turns into a powerful bomb due to the dioptric compulsion to stand on your face. Right? that you probably won't activate their function as an accessory. Unless you're a masochist. You would prefer to remove them instead of accumulating and accumulating more and more pressure which eventually turns into a powerful bomb due to the dioptric compulsion to stand on your face. Right?