Skip to content
Love and affairs

Same-sex Marriages. Are You For Or Against?

By lizthefitt September 14, 2020 50 answers Last updated September 14, 2020

Hello! I just read the topic "Lesbian" published on this site three months ago in the "Sex and Intimacy" department. It was a question of how a 43-year-old mother discovered that her 19-year-old daughter was a lesbian. I read all the comments and the opinion of the commenters was more or less about 50% are positive and about 50% are negative about lesbianism. I also have an opinion on gay men and lesbian women, but I will express my opinion if my topic is published. Moderators, this is the second time I've sent you this topic, but the first time you didn't post it to me. I ask you why after so many other topics you publish that I don't think should be published. I am sending you this topic because same-sex marriage has become legal in almost all of Western Europe, as well as in many other countries around the world. What led to this phenomenon? !! We all know that there have always been and will continue to be gay men and lesbian women. But should they legally marry. Here's the big news: Queen Elizabeth of England, one of her cousins ​​named Lord Ivar Mountbatten, will marry his partner James Coyle. Both are somewhere in middle age. Interestingly, Lord Ivar Mountbatten was married and had three daughter children. Even the queen doesn't mind this marriage. Well, once gay marriage is legal in the English kingdom, what about the rest of the world. What do you think, dear readers, are you for or against same-sex marriage? Tell your opinion frankly. I ask the moderators to show understanding and publish the topic. I don't see how this topic defiles your site. that there have always been and will continue to be gay men and lesbian women. But should they legally marry. Here's the big news: Queen Elizabeth of England, one of her cousins ​​named Lord Ivar Mountbatten, will marry his partner James Coyle. Both are somewhere in middle age. Interestingly, Lord Ivar Mountbatten was married and had three daughter children. Even the queen doesn't mind this marriage. Well, once gay marriage is legal in the English kingdom, what about the rest of the world. What do you think, dear readers, are you for or against same-sex marriage? Tell your opinion frankly.

I ask the moderators to show understanding and publish the topic. I don't see how this topic defiles your site. that there have always been and will continue to be gay men and lesbian women. But should they legally marry. Here is the biggest news: To Queen Elizabeth of England, one of her cousins ​​named Lord Ivar Mountbatten will marry his partner James Coyle. Both are somewhere in middle age. Interestingly, Lord Ivar Mountbatten was married and had three daughter children. Even the queen doesn't mind this marriage. Well, once gay marriage is legal in the English kingdom, what about the rest of the world. What do you think, dear readers, are you for or against same-sex marriage? Tell your opinion frankly. I ask the moderators to show understanding and publish the topic. I don't see how this topic defiles your site. Here's the big news: Queen Elizabeth of England, one of her cousins ​​named Lord Ivar Mountbatten, will marry his partner James Coyle. Both are somewhere in middle age. Interestingly, Lord Ivar Mountbatten was married and had three daughter children. Even the queen doesn't mind this marriage. Well, once gay marriage is legal in the English kingdom, what about the rest of the world. What do you think, dear readers, are you for or against same-sex marriage? Tell your opinion frankly. I ask the moderators to show understanding and publish the topic. I don't see how this topic defiles your site. Here's the big news: Queen Elizabeth of England, one of her cousins ​​named Lord Ivar Mountbatten, will marry his partner James Coyle.

Both are somewhere in middle age. Interestingly, Lord Ivar Mountbatten was married and had three daughter children. Even the queen doesn't mind this marriage. Well, once gay marriage is legal in the English kingdom, what about the rest of the world. What do you think, dear readers, are you for or against same-sex marriage? Tell your opinion frankly. I ask the moderators to show understanding and publish the topic. I don't see how this topic defiles your site. that Lord Ivar Mountbatten was married and had three children-daughters. Even the queen doesn't mind this marriage. Well, once gay marriage is legal in the English kingdom, what about the rest of the world. What do you think, dear readers, are you for or against same-sex marriage?

Tell your opinion frankly. I ask the moderators to show understanding and publish the topic. I don't see how this topic defiles your site. that Lord Ivar Mountbatten was married and had three children-daughters. Even the queen doesn't mind this marriage. Well, once gay marriage is legal in the English kingdom, what about the rest of the world. What do you think, dear readers, are you for or against same-sex marriage? Tell your opinion frankly. I ask the moderators to show understanding and publish the topic. I don't see how this topic defiles your site.

Answers 50

1
meganm18 answered · September 14, 2020

   As the Queen of England, you have nothing to say in spite of it? The United States and Britain are run by Jewish banking families, who financially hold the world on credit and create wars and crises. I am not against gay marriages, let them be, as long as they DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ADOPT CHILDREN. Answer the questions why.

2
kpsharmaoli answered · September 14, 2020

   I don't think any party will make a fuss about it. This does not matter to society. In my opinion, the big question is whether they will be able to adopt children?

3
bigtitsconnie answered · September 14, 2020

   I agree. Everyone deserves to be happier.

4
sydneyvandenbosch answered · September 14, 2020

   As a gay woman, I want them to be legal.

5
riomiss777 answered · September 15, 2020

   I am a heterosexual man. I am not a homophobe, for me sexual orientation does not make someone better or worse and is not a factor in my assessment of someone. I even have a gay friend. I consider gay parades to be nonsense, but they don't bother me much. In my opinion, however, marriage is an institution that is the basis of the family and the upbringing of the child. And a child, no matter what they tell me, needs a mother and a father. You need both figures. Yes, homosexuals as people are no worse than others, it's up to the man. But imagine a boy with two mothers. Who will teach him to be a man, to defend himself when he is harassed, to lead him to matches? I think that some legal form of cohabitation of same-sex couples can be made, which would give, for example, the right in case of death of one partner, the other to receive a share of the inheritance or if someone is in hospital, the other to be able to visit it. But marriage is between a man and a woman.

6
lmerrigan2 answered · September 15, 2020

   For!

7
cocinandoconjorge answered · September 15, 2020

   Does it just seem to me or have homosexuals become too much? Compared to years before? !! Or have they always been many, but already with this democracy, freedom of speech, social networks, pornography on the media and not only, they feel somehow free and do not bother to show it and do not hide it? !! On television, gays, transvestites, lesbians, and separately so much nudity in general are calmly shown in various programs, and this, in my opinion, has an extremely great influence on the younger and adolescents. It may sound "stupid", but I have a feeling that some of the so-called "homosexuals" are the product of all this. In a way, it influenced them to become and be that way. I know, I know that God created them, that this is not a personal choice, but I am confused by this World. From everything nowadays. It's just kind of wrong ... About marriages - well, the fact is that they really become legal on a large scale. Maybe in other countries people are ahead in thinking than we are. We are lagging behind as a development of the whole country and morally. I admit I'm not very "for", but in the end we're all human and if that's what homosexuals want - well, OK. As they say, we all have a bunch of problems to attach so much importance to their needs, desires. Let it be legal with us as well. Only if they can't kiss or push in public, because that's what comes in handy. I find it extremely disgusting ... It doesn't matter a man with a man or a woman with a woman. Because people accept more when two women kiss, but for me it's equal. And I am against the adoption of children by such couples. It is so unnatural, nature has created us this way - from a male and a female individual to have a generation. There are laws in nature ... Not to mention from a religious point of view (because I believe, but I can't say I'm one of those religious people). I have no homosexual friends, I have communicated a few times with such acquaintances ... They are not bad people. Even a few lesbians took me down. Abe, everyone is looking for happiness, but the world has become perverted ... Who knows what awaits us in the future. :) F, 27 but the world has become perverted .. Who knows what awaits us in the future. :) F, 27 but the world has become perverted .. Who knows what awaits us in the future. :) F, 27

8
jessicah_rabbit answered · September 16, 2020

   I am absolutely against it! F19

9
img14 answered · September 16, 2020

   I don't mind getting married, but honestly, if I imagine that such individuals would go around my children one day - I retort .. F, 19

10
koketka7_69 answered · September 16, 2020

   "Well, once homosexual marriages become legal in the English kingdom, what about the rest of the world." - in the English kingdom and Sharia is legal ... (https://www.inbrief.co.uk/preparing-for-trial/shariah-in-britain)

11
abcfc answered · September 17, 2020

   Nice topic. In fact, our society is quite archaic, but otherwise philosophically minded and confident. What is the problem of men or women living together, what they do in bed is their job and if these people are worthy they do not break the law, why should they be disturbed. We are deaf to the children growing up in the Bulgarian ghettos in misery and violence, children who are primates cannot form a sentence, but if two gay intellectual lawyers want to adopt a child who will study in top schools, will travel, will know several languages then the table will open its mouth. And in the world this is normal, but it is normal if the child grows malnourished and in a bad environment, then the social intervenes. Watch on YouTube how two women look after their children, worn by one with a donor egg. Great both. I'm not a lesbian, my family of those classic, but I think it's time to change, because the world is changing and these people are not criminals. I live abroad and here the children learn what kind of families there are, I read. The children accept the different options quite normally, but in Bulgaria this is abnormal. It is normal for a woman to be beaten and even killed and the state to be inactive. No matter how much I don't watch News, I remember 3 cases from the last year, in fact, 1 more from this month, so 4. And you will say this is not normal, but it is a fact. Let everyone look at themselves, be tolerant, but not tolerant of violence, corruption and obscenity, which expel thousands every year, nothing that convinces us otherwise. The children accept the different options quite normally, but in Bulgaria this is abnormal. It is normal for a woman to be beaten and even killed and the state to be inactive. No matter how much I don't watch News, I remember 3 cases from the last year, in fact, 1 more from this month, so 4. And you will say this is not normal, but it is a fact. Let everyone look at themselves, be tolerant, but not tolerant of violence, corruption and obscenity, which expel thousands every year, nothing that convinces us otherwise. The children accept the different options quite normally, but in Bulgaria this is abnormal. It is normal for a woman to be beaten and even killed and the state to be inactive. No matter how much I don't watch News, I remember 3 cases from the last year, in fact, 1 more from this month, so 4. And you will say this is not normal, but it is a fact. Let everyone look at themselves, be tolerant, but not tolerant of violence, corruption and obscenity, which expel thousands every year, nothing that convinces us otherwise.

12
gymbrown answered · September 17, 2020

   I am not against, but there is no denying the fact, it is there and I define it as debauchery. Debauchery in relationships, in elections, in understandings. There is no class, there is no love. But what to do ....

13
levihatter answered · September 17, 2020

   For!

14
canadiantire answered · September 18, 2020

   In my opinion, same-sex marriages should be legalized. I don't see what exactly they would do to the rest of the people. But on the other hand, they would make life easier and happier for those who wish to conclude such. And getting married is not just a way to show your partner that you love him / her, but also in critical situations it is an important condition to be able to participate in life-saving decisions that affect him / her or your family. children. So yes, I definitely think that if heterosexual people have the right to take this step, then homosexuals should have one too. And by no means do I agree with the claim that such legalization will corrupt society and make more and more people suddenly change their sexual orientation out of nowhere.

15
karlousm answered · September 18, 2020

   For same-sex marriages, against the adoption of children by same-sex couples, against making a fuss about it, against parading, against being an occasion for division. I am heterosexual

16
sheillaraquel answered · September 18, 2020

   I am against. And no, because I'm not tolerant of gay people, not at all. I keep children growing up in a normal, healthy and calm environment. In this line of thought, if I had the opportunity, I would deprive a large part of modern "society" of the right to reproduce. And after the homosexuals, they will start demanding the same extras as the pedophiles, then the polygamists, just look, the necrophiles called and what not ...

17
andromedamoon answered · September 18, 2020

   Against!

18
gootch3583 answered · September 19, 2020

   I agree. So what? When they take over, au debauchery, I don't know what you are. As ugly as it is to push two men or two women, it is ugly to push a man and a woman in a public place. Why not get married? In Greece, before it became a Christian state, in Plato's time it was quite normal for men. Who does not believe in reading "Plato's Feast". And suddenly all the great Christians became! Homosexuals were not normal, the Church, God, what did they think! To judge, to hate, to envy is very Christian and moral! God loves everything He has created! What do you want from people? Heterosexual

19
kboricua answered · September 19, 2020

   I agree. Given that it is a civil marriage and has nothing to do with religion, etc. After all, these are two people who love each other and want to swear allegiance to each other for life. It doesn't matter what gender they are. Love is love. I PREFER TO SEE TWO MEN HOLDING HER HANDS TOO.

20
daddysgirl0101 answered · September 19, 2020

   Of course, for.

21
khun.park answered · September 19, 2020

   FOR! I'm gay and I was born that way, why don't I have the same rights as everyone else just because I like other things? If other people have the right to marry or I have the same, I am neither duller nor inferior to them to limit me in my life with a person who agrees and is my partner regardless of gender. We don't stop anyone from being happy together, I can't understand backward people who think that the world revolves around them and their supposedly "normal" sexuality. Being gay doesn't stop me from being the best in my profession and the best in what I do, in time I will become an aviator and your smallest problem will be what I am when your life depends on me!

22
saidharamtej answered · September 19, 2020

   Yes, it is high time to legalize them in our country as well!

23
natasha_sumer answered · September 20, 2020

   For. I see no reason to object. After all, we all want to feel loved, and to love. And this does not harm others in any way. Look, if you ask me about the adoption of children by such couples, I will probably have a different opinion. But for marriage, yes, let's love and "officially".

24
mercedesbenzmx answered · September 20, 2020

   I have nothing against same-sex marriage. And in general, I believe that everyone has the right to live as they wish, as long as they do not harm someone else's life. There is a tendency, something like a mental disorder, perhaps, for a lot of people to try in every way to put in a certain frame everyone who is outside it. And the interesting thing is that these people are usually not happy - they are not happy with themselves (what they do / do not do / with their life .. / not / have achieved in their life), and / or have not succeeded in love ( were dumped, cheated on, or caught up with someone they didn't really like but were with for one or more reasons, often in their heads). Criticism and condemnation is the favorite sport of the unhappy or, come on, of the unhappy people - of the dissatisfied and dissatisfied.

25
jparkitrighthere answered · September 20, 2020

   I am for. If a man has found his soulmate in a person of the same sex - let them be happy together. This will avoid cover-up marriages, some divorces and people will have the opportunity to be happy in their home country.

26
kellyasian answered · September 20, 2020

   This relationship is a perversion. As you can see, these and any other distortions are not just tolerated, they are advertised and an attempt is made to make normal people accept them as something normal. Here we must ask ourselves the question: Who and why is making this enormous effort. In order to properly answer these questions, one must turn to the Holy Scriptures - the Bible, to see what God has said about it, to see what is happening in the world and what is the worldview of those who promote these perversions and to whom they serve. In the scriptures, the Almighty warns against these and many other perversions not to be practiced, warns that these things were done in the past, and this has led to the destruction of these peoples and civilizations who did these things. Now let's see who are the ones who impose these deviations on people and what they believe. In order not to go to extremes and go too deep and say things that many are not yet ready to accept because they cannot fit into their worldview, I will say that these people hate God, Christ, Christians and Christianity. They hate the idea that God can tell them what to do. They want to do what they want without taking any responsibility. The very idea that a person is responsible for his actions and will have to explain the choices he has made in his life is intolerable for them, because they love evil, they like to do things that are wrong and the very thought that they will have to responsible for it hangs like a sword of Damocles over their heads and they can't stand it. They do and propagate things that are the exact opposite of what God determines to do or not to do in the scriptures. Their whole behavior is a rebellion against God. All their symbolism is associated with this revolt. Take, for example, the building of the European Parliament, it is based on the picture of Bruegel - the Tower of Babel. The parliament, which is made as an unfinished tower, is a symbol of the rejection of God's Word by these people. The construction of the original Tower of Babel was stopped personally by the Almighty and this is described in the Holy Scriptures. These people will not stop and will promote the most heinous and heinous perversions, will pour huge funds into grants and foundations in order to corrupt society to the extreme. Let's go back to your question about same-sex marriages and what their meaning is. They do not make sense if viewed rationally, because because they are a distortion of the normal and right, they can not produce fruit - children. The meaning of legalizing and forcing them is directed against God and His Word. They want to tell Him - you see, we will do the exact opposite of what You said. After all, what will happen to these people and those who follow them in their madness? You can guess for yourself that something terrible is waiting for them. After all, what will happen to these people and those who follow them in their madness? You can guess for yourself that something terrible is waiting for them. After all, what will happen to these people and those who follow them in their madness? You can guess for yourself that something terrible is waiting for them.

27
giannisacco07 answered · September 20, 2020

   Against! If humans were created to mate with the same sex, then there would be no second sex.

28
bernadettszel answered · September 21, 2020

   29, nature sometimes makes mistakes, for which people are not to blame for being born that way. There is homosexuality in animals as well.

29
greekgirly answered · September 21, 2020

   a lot FOR!

30
cherywhite answered · September 21, 2020

   For me, marriage still means too much to allow to be trampled on, so I strongly oppose it. After same-sex marriages, they will ask for marriages with animals, objects, triple and larger groups to be married and in general to have harems for both a man with many women and a woman with many men or the same sex. If they start humiliating an institution called marriage, they will not stop until they disgust even the most moderate. So I think it's time to kick their chair and end the big claims. Once you give them a finger, they will get used to being eternally dissatisfied and wanting more, and more, and more, and more ... for the rest of the world. PS They didn't post your topic because it will cause unnecessary scandals with the few but vocal homosexuals and liberals on the site. They are like that - 5 people on a cross, and they are trying to pass for a million with screaming and making noise. Pity, that they did not listen to their common sense this time too! I predict at least 2 pages of topic with the option to reach 3!

31
pmoffice_mn answered · September 21, 2020

   What is the English royal family worth? This irritated me a lot as a criterion. We are just as many people without noble titles, I would even say much more, because none of them knows what a really difficult life and struggle is. People in the spotlight are not a criterion and are not a measure of anything, no matter who they are, due to the simple fact that they do not live the life of an ordinary person unknown to anyone. Otherwise, I am against the adoption of children. Whether they get married or not doesn't bother me much. But it irritates me a lot to deny heterosexuality with all its characteristics, the most important of which is to produce offspring, and to enjoy it at the same time. I find this hypocritical and disgusting. If you are gay, you have to accept that you will not have children, that is right for me! And that those whose sexuality you deny, they will not make them for you and give them away (sell)! Let them not pretend to be greater than the Lord.

32
liveaustere answered · September 22, 2020

   There is no good reason other than adoption to justify gay marriage. And because I'm strongly against allowing homosexual couples to adopt children, I'm also against homo marriages. Homosexuals do not need the institution of marriage, everything material between them is regulated by the law of cohabitation, and the specifics can be further agreed. Grandpa Torbalan

33
adelareguera answered · September 22, 2020

   Definitely AGAINST, if someone insists I will explain further!

34
fuckupmyballs answered · September 22, 2020

   For. Given that heterosexuals don't want to get married (because it was a piece of paper), I don't see why homosexuals can't.

35
dn.se answered · September 22, 2020

   "If you're gay you have to accept that you won't have children, that's right for me!" From where, to where! ?? The right of reproduction is a primordial biological HUMAN right! Sexual orientation is NOT RELATED to reproductive ability!

36
natural_life_entertainment answered · September 22, 2020

   I am bisexual and have a 4 year relationship with the most beautiful and understanding woman in the world with whom I feel really happy. It is strange to me that there are people who are still against, meaning - we are in the 21st century, there is nothing wrong and perverted in this. This is a human choice. Everyone has the right to be loved, to have a family and to enjoy their children. It is terribly selfish and sad for someone to deprive you of this joy, how will you feel if you are without children all your life, they are the meaning of life. I am for adoption, I do not know why you think that we are some kind of perverts and cannot raise our children ... This in no way means that they are inferior to others, or will not have upbringing and values. It all depends on us to teach them how to be good people, to respect the different, to be proud of what they are. Isn't it more important to have understanding and happiness in a family than whether it consists of two men or two women ... I don't even pay attention to things like skin color, orientation, origin - I see it like everyone else , I don't even think about it, the character is important, not who is what. Rejecting a person for such factors is limited, complex and you risk losing great people. :)

37
thiccynikkie answered · September 22, 2020

   Homosexuals both want us to be modern and to accept them, and they insist on marriage, which is an institution neglected by modern people ... Where does this contradiction come from? Well, very simply, when they say that they are married, they already have reason to want and have other people's children, for the simple reason that they cannot create on their own. Marriage is a union between a woman and a man in order to have and raise children. Those who cannot have children have no place in this institution! If they can't accept the fact, they should explode, not impose their sick idea of ​​the world on us. And stealing / buying other people's children is violence against the children themselves, depriving them of their biological parents, subjecting them to abnormal socialization, in which instead of having access to both the male and female models, they have access to some completely different models.

38
anygabriellyofficial answered · September 23, 2020

   From 7 to 39 - no one says you're a pervert, a worse person or something. But if your son is a victim of hooligans, who will teach him to defend himself - you or your partner? Who will take him to the match? From whom will he learn to be a man? A child needs his father and mother. My father left us when I was 3. And believe me, it affects a person's psyche a lot, even if he doesn't understand it. Read about the child's relationship with his father and mother during different periods of childhood. I know other people who grew up with one parent. There are consequences. Not that it can't be overcome, but it matters. For the same reason, I am against single parents adopting children. Beyond that, I have no problem maintaining friendships with homosexuals, it doesn't matter to me. My gay friend knows about my position, disagrees, but respects it.

39
slavebartt answered · September 23, 2020

   39, although I am heterosexual, I want full rights for you. But with one exception - not to have the right to children. And not for you, but for the children. It was selfish not to have children. Isn't it selfish to subject children to intentionally not having a father or a mother? Just don't tell me how there is no problem to have 2 mothers and 0 fathers, because that affects the child. And yes, it is not better to grow up with alcoholic parents, but still children no one asks them if they want to have 2 mothers, not a mother and father. This is selfish. You do whatever you want with each other, but involve third parties, including children, who have no right to choose and have an opinion. And they are people, and they have the right to a normal family. The fact that they are small or unborn and cannot speak does not mean that they should become instruments of your happiness at the expense of their proper development. I don't think

40
amanda_greco answered · September 23, 2020

   In reality, gay people have the same rights as heterosexuals, I don't understand why they should have more rights? That is, the heterosexual Minka has the right to marry, the lesbian Pena has the same right, the fact that Pena does not want to use her right to marry does not give her the right to demonstrate her sexuality in parades in order to demand more rights. The moment the society gives more rights to a certain group of people, some lawsuits for discrimination will start, some demands for even more rights. We have experience in giving rights to gypsies, let's not be wrong with another group of minorities. What is the official marriage of gay couples for, if not for adoption?

41
thepointsguy answered · September 23, 2020

   For! If I have the right to marry and legalize union with a loved one, why shouldn't others? Are they less human than I am? Or maybe they are a lower category of people and deserve less rights? God bless everyone so that they can connect in this way with the person they love.

42
karenziefeldt answered · September 23, 2020

   Hello Author, "Same-sex marriages. Are you for or against?" My answer is: I am AGAINST same-sex "marriages". Why? Because: - a man and a man cannot; and a woman and a woman to represent a family and to have a marriage. Homosexuals are NOT a family and have NEVER been a family. - MARRIAGE (be it civil or religious) and FAMILY are FOR HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES, consisting of MAN and WOMAN. - ONLY THE HETEROSEXUAL COUPLE, CONSISTING OF A MAN AND A WOMAN, HAVE TRUE LOVE, OFFSPRING, FAMILY AND MARRIAGE. - Homosexuality is a perversion of the human person. Homosexuality undermines, corrupts, destroys society. And this perversion also leads to the physical death of human society. Every perversion leads to the physical death of people. - God and nature CONDEMN and are AGAINST homosexuality and all other perversions. Animals do NOT know and do not know about homosexuality. If people recognize homosexuality as something normal - then with this atrocity they become inferior to unreasonable animals who do NOT know and are AGAINST homosexuality.

43
singeramar answered · September 23, 2020

   Although I hate homosexuals, I think it is better for a child to be with 2 mothers than with a mother and a runaway father with whom they do not know or who beats him every day or to grow up in an orphanage. Now it remains to say that they will be better off in an orphanage.

44
jonasjerebko answered · September 24, 2020

   Up to 38 of those who criticize: Did homosexuals have the right to reproduce? I wonder how this happens outside of heterosexuals. And how do you use its product by denying something? You're not from the same dough, aren't there any other sexes for you? So the lesbian mother will not know what a man is and will raise a man, right? What will he teach him - to love men or women? What about two gay fathers - how will they look after their daughter and what will they teach her? How to protect yourself from getting pregnant? By whom? Or they will teach her to choose the opposite sex - "we are different, but you must not be like us, no, a mistake - like us ..." Come on. Everything has its limits. To get married, if they want 15 times, if they want 150, but not to touch the children!

45
luisana64 answered · September 24, 2020

   For! Everyone should have the right to marry the person he loves. For and for having children. This has not been shown to adversely affect children. Are all children happy with heterosexual couples? From a heterosexual woman

46
casaruibarbosa answered · September 24, 2020

   Strongly against. In a sense, no one is stopping you from satisfying your urge. Let everyone do it with whomever and however they want. But marriage is an institution that sustains the family. Legalizing same-sex marriage means signaling to the public that such a thing is normal and supported. Well no, it's not normal. And it never will be. At the very least, this is a bad example for children who are still self-determining and encourages them to make the wrong decision. Every negai on this earth means one wrong brain less. And that's good.

47
senku13 answered · September 24, 2020

   From the author. I see that the topic gathers a lot of comments. This is good. Let's hear the opinions of more people. As I promised, I will express my opinion if they publish the topic. Here's what I think and think about same-sex marriage. First I want to say that I am not a man clogged with old-fashioned understandings and I am in step with today's times and modern understandings of people. I accept the fact that there are homosexual men and women and that they have the right to personal relations with each other in any form, as long as they do not interfere with the public order and morals with which most people have lived for centuries. When I say this, I mean their sexual relationship with each other. Nobody forbids them to have sex, to love each other, to live together in a house bought with common funds, to have common bank accounts and many other things inherent in all of us. But there is something in nature created, whether by God or by nature itself, that must not be disturbed. It is that God created man of two sexes, male and female, in order to reproduce the human species. This is a natural law. In the very distant past of mankind, millions of years ago, man was bisexual, ie. hermaphrodite and has reproduced itself. But God has divided the sexes into male and female so that two individuals can take care of the growth of the new generation. After two people created a third, God instilled in them a sense of concern for the growth of the new creature. The man provided the food and the woman raised the newborn. Later, societies decided to make this bond between the two sexes stronger for the better development of the newborn, and so came the idea of ​​marriage, which later became legal. Some commentators have justified homosexual marriages as necessary for the couple to be happy. Weren't such couples happy without marriage !!! Will a signature make them happy !!! This is a very naive explanation. As some have said, once you are gay, you have to accept that you should not have children. But I want to ask those parents who have a son or daughter how they would feel if their daughter was a lesbian married to another lesbian, or their son was gay married to another gay. Will you tell your neighbors or relatives that your daughter is at the theater with her wife, or that your son is traveling with his husband. It's funny, isn't it. Let's not pretend to be so modern that we lived in the 21st century. Not everything modern is acceptable. I think someone mentioned perverted marriages, such as a brother marrying his sister or a father marrying his daughter, or first-line cousins. Well, if we don't legitimize the desires of pedophiles, they also want to be happy. I read about a man who wants to marry his horse. And will he feel happier? I would not be surprised if someone wants to marry their dog. Anyone who watches porn will also see sex with dogs. Well, the dog is the best pet, whether such a marriage should be allowed to make their owners happier. People, there have always been homosexuals and there will be in the future, because I know the reason for their existence, but let's think a little more deeply about what can be allowed and what should not be allowed. I repeat that I have nothing against homosexuals. Let them live as they please behind closed doors in their home, but without marriage and without public demonstrations and without children. There are natural laws that are eternal, they are immutable, but there are also human laws that must comply with natural laws. The law of same-sex marriage is an unnatural law.

48
auschwitzmuseum answered · September 24, 2020

   I live in the United States and same-sex marriage is allowed here. We live in a safe neighborhood with wealthy people, and one of the neighbors is two women. They have a son, one of whom is pregnant by a donor. I don't see anything unusual in their way of life. Quite a normal family, inviting neighbors, friends for a barbecue and no difference at all. They are even more social and have guests more often. It's great for us as neighbors, BUT I don't know what it's like for their son. The child is very well-mannered, hard-working and does my services to people - he takes the dogs for a walk, watches our cats while we are on vacation and so on, but he is a very small boy and he lacks masculinity. Perhaps this would have been the case with other parents. In our country there are often children raised only by women - grandmothers and mothers, and men are either exiled or completely escaped. I don't see any big problem. However, my opinion is, that before such a practice is allowed in our country, it is good to see the results from other countries. And without that, our society is not ready, let's wait. If the children of gay couples do not have more mental and other problems than heterosexual couples, I am OK. ж33

49
jacobbix answered · September 25, 2020

   Against. I am for the traditional values ​​of society, because everything else leads to the disintegration of society and the destruction of our nation.

50
kymmyummy_xxx3 answered · September 25, 2020

   These are people with disabilities and I can't be like the others - what marriages, what five levs! To accept that they are not complete and to roll, and not to stare into our eyes. "I am gay and I want rights like the others" - you want to, but you are not like the others so you will not have rights !!!